December 3, 2023

This sound is generated automatically. If you have feedback, please let us know.

The Biden administration is seeking more leverage over owners and leaders of colleges it deems risky, unveiling a new set of conditions it will use to hold individuals personally liable when private institutions cost government money.

New guidance issued this week outlines how the U.S. Department of Education plans to require private college leaders to take personal responsibility for unpaid debts owed to the government when their institutions “fail to operate in a fiscally responsible manner.” That means the government could try to recover money from individuals for some colleges’ financial aid obligations.

For example, the government could try to recoup the money it pays out under a closed-ended graduation program that forgives students’ federal loans if their colleges close. Or it could go after costs ranging from borrower defense to a repayment program that settles loan debt when colleges are found to have misled students or violated the law.

Prior to these guidelines, the Department of Education did not have practices for holding individual college owners or executives accountable for unpaid obligations incurred by at-risk colleges. stated in a press release.

The top official of the Ministry of Education selected for-profit colleges. The agency is currently canceling loans for more than 1 million borrowers “defrauded by for-profit colleges,” and the owners and executives of those institutions too often avoid accountability, Assistant Secretary James Kvaal said in a statement.

“Congress has given the department the authority to hold college owners and operators personally liable for these losses under certain circumstances, and we will use that authority to hold them accountable, protect vulnerable students, protect taxpayer dollars and deter future risky behavior,” Kvaal said .

The year of breaking through the corporate veil

The new guidelines come about a year into the Biden administration he said he would sometime require the controlling units of institutions to agree to financial responsibility for repayment of student loans in certain cases. If the company refused to agree, its college would not be eligible for federal Title IV financial aid.

The move, described as piercing the corporate veil of limited liability, drew sharp disapproval from for-profit colleges. They expressed concern that it would reduce investor interest in higher education and stifle innovation.

But it didn’t go far enough for some Senate Democrats, who asked the Ministry of Education hold for-profit owners personally liable if their institutions have misled students and left them heavily in debt.

A group representing for-profit colleges, universities and career colleges protested the moves this week. The Higher Education Act limits the Department of Education’s power to pierce the corporate veil and place financial responsibility on individuals, Nicholas Kent, director of policy at CECU, said in a statement.

“This administration proposes to exceed that authority through new regulations and subjective guidance, empowering ideologically motivated partisans with the unlimited discretion needed to achieve their goal of abolishing private career schools while limiting students’ ability to choose the educational environment that best fits their circumstances . Kent said.

However, the Ministry of Education said that the Higher Education Act supports his actions. § 498 letter E) The law says the agency can demand personal liability from individuals who have substantial control over private institutions.

How the new tutorial works

March 1st Federal Student Aid Notice states how the Ministry of Education plans to proceed. It applies to program participation agreements — contracts that college leaders must sign in order to use federal financial aid dollars.

In some cases, participation agreements in the program will now require individuals and companies involved in the finance and administration of the college to agree to take personal responsibility for financial losses that the government absorbs.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *